Number of words: 1,765<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Winglets predate the Wright brothers, but it took nearly a century for the idea to go mainstream. When Boeing\u2019s new 777X taxied out for takeoff for its first flight earlier this year, it shared the look of most modern airliners. Its long fuselage was flanked by two massive engines under its long wings\u2014the tips, known better as \u201cwinglets,\u201d turned up in familiar fashion. This is just the latest chapter in a 120-year-long quest to create a better airplane wing. Today, Boeing, Airbus, Embraer, Gulfstream, Bombardier, and other manufacturers produce multiple aircraft types with winglets, but as recently as the late 1990s, you rarely saw winglets on passenger aircraft.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The idea of turning a wingtip up (or down) dates back to the 19th century. In 1897, English engineer Frederick W. Lanchester patented the placement of end plates vertically at the tip of a wing to control wingtip vortices. Generally only visible in high moisture conditions, clouds, or fog, vortices appear as twisting ribbons of air behind the wing, almost like mini tornadoes turned sideways. As air flows over the wingtip of a conventional airplane, it tends to roll upward from the high pressure area under the wing to the low-pressure area above it. At speed, airflow over the tip of the wing is also forced backward. This backward flow combines with the upward roll from under the wing to form a vortex. They may look cool, but they\u2019re a major drag, literally. Vortices cause lift-induced drag, lowering the efficiency of the wing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Though Lanchester recognized the problem, he never demonstrated his endplate on an aircraft. That feat would be left to Scottish engineer William Sommerville, who in 1910 patented what are considered to be the first functional winglets. Further research was done in the 1920s and 30s, but it wasn\u2019t until World War II that winglets became more common. But as aviation developed in the post-War era, winglets disappeared from most commercial and military aircraft\u2014until 1973’s global oil embargo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
LESS DRAG = LESS FUEL<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) drastically cut oil exports in the fall of 1973, crude oil went from $3 per barrel to almost $12 a barrel by March, 1974. Then (same as now) fuel accounted for 40 to 50 percent of operating costs of a single flight, depending on the type of airliner used. It was no surprise that airlines were hit hard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The dramatic spike in oil prices got Richard Whitcomb, an aeronautical engineer at NASA\u2019s Langley Research Center, thinking about winglets. He had studied Lanchester\u2019s original concept and surmised that making the vertical surface of a winglet a refined airfoil would more effectively allow it to interact with the wingtip airflow vortices, reducing drag.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Whitcomb began a series of wind tunnel tests using a model of a DC-10, evaluating winglets at different airspeeds with different flap and aileron configurations. He found that adding them to the DC-10 model reduced overall drag by five percent compared to the model without the devices. In the mid-1970s, Boeing made its own engineering study of a 747 with winglets, which predicted a four percent reduction in aero drag.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As the NASA and Boeing studies went forward, Bill Lear\u2019s innovative Learjet Corporation actually put winglets on its prototype Learjet 28 business jet in 1977. It became the first production jet to use winglets. In flight testing, they reportedly increased range by 6.5 percent. Bizjet maker, Gulfstream, also experimented with winglets in the late 1970s, installing them on the Gulfstream III in 1980.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The collective research inspired a test program for an airliner-sized aircraft at the NASA Dryden Flight Research Center in 1979-80. The U.S. Air Force furnished a KC-135 aerial refueling tanker (similar to a Boeing 707) for testing and Boeing built prototype winglets measuring nine feet high and six feet across at the base. The winglet-equipped KC-135 first flew on July 24, 1979. Another 47 test flights followed, evaluating it against the stock KC-135 configuration. The results were close to what Whitcomb had forecast in his wind tunnel studies, only better. Drag decreased by 6.5 percent according to NASA with a corresponding reduction in fuel consumption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Despite the added fuel benefits, it still took awhile for the aviation industry to catch on. In the mid 1980s, Boeing was looking to revamp flagging sales of its 747 Jumbo Jet by increasing range and lowering operating costs. The 747-400 was the first commercial airliner ever to feature winglets. According to Boeing, winglets increased the 747-400’s range by 3.5 percent over its 747-300 predecessor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
While it seemed that winglets had finally arrived (McDonnell Douglas\u2019 MD-11 debuted them in 1990), a small Seattle aviation company would be the one to really accelerate winglets as a standard feature in modern aviation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As Boeing cranked out its 747-400, Joe Clark was well into a career that included Learjet sales, establishing a regional airline, and selling ex-military training aircraft to American companies and individuals. One day his business partner, Dennis Washington, called. He\u2019d admired the winglets on Gulfstream\u2019s GIII and asked Clark if he could add a pair to his own Gulfstream GII.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cHe really just wanted to modernize his airplane and make it look better,\u201d Clark told Popular Mechanics. Instead of simply installing the standard GIII winglets, Clark gathered together a team of retired Boeing and Lockheed engineers and came up with a new concept\u2013the blended winglet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
While canted winglets, like the ones on NASA’s KC-135, attach to the wingtip at a sharp angle approaching 90 degrees. A blended winglet attaches to the wing with a smooth curve instead of a sharp angle, reducing interference drag at the wing\/winglet junction. Shaping and sizing the winglet properly is crucial to getting a vortex away from the flat, planar part of the wing Clark says. His newly formed Aviation Partners Incorporated (API) evaluated different shapes for Washington\u2019s GII wing, finally building prototypes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In 1993, Clark\u2019s team flew the GII with its blended winglets. The bizjet had 7.2 percent less drag with its new appendages. The improvement spurred an aftermarket business building blended winglets for the Gulfstream II, eventually equipping over 80 percent of those produced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ironically, most business jet customers aren\u2019t really motivated by the fuel efficiency gains Clark says. \u201cThey do it for the looks. The perception is that when you put winglets on, you get what looks like a whole new airplane.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
API\u2019s blended winglets are on over 1,000 business jets today, including the Hawker 800 and Dassault Falcon. As API\u2019s success grew, it made an agreement with Boeing to install winglets on its 737-derived Boeing Business Jet (BBJ) in 1996. The BBJ caught the attention of airlines who, like bizjet owners, dug the look of blended winglets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cWhen the airlines came to me they said \u2018We know they don\u2019t work\u2019. I said, let me do a study. We did it and I told them they\u2019d get between five and seven percent better fuel efficiency. \u2018Impossible,\u2019 they said. I said, I\u2019ll build a set of prototype [blended winglets] and fly them at my expense if you give me an airplane.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Clark got one of the first Boeing 737-800s, owned by Air Berlin, flight tested with blended winglets and achieved the fuel efficiency gains he promised. \u201cThey were so impressed with the winglets, they installed them on their first 60 [737-800] airplanes,” Clark says. In 1999, API formed a joint venture with Boeing (Aviation Partners Boeing) to sell aftermarket winglets for its 737NG airliners. The company subsequently developed blended winglet programs for the Boeing 737 classic, 757, and 767-300ER. API has installed 20,000 winglets on 10,000 airplanes (900 bizjets, 9,100 airliners), saving an estimated 10.4 billion gallons of fuel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
One of the advantages of winglets is that they effectively increase wingspan without increasing the horizontal length of the wing. That\u2019s an issue for the 777X which, as the largest twin-engined widebody ever made, has a wingspan of over 235 feet\u201323 feet more than the older 777-300 variant. The longer wing means the 777X cannot fit into the gate and ramp areas commonly used by the 747-400 and 777-300ER. To address the problem, Boeing integrated 24-foot folding wing tip sections, called “raked wingtips.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n
On the ground, they\u2019re folded up, looking like canted winglets. But before takeoff, the flight crew folds them down, regaining the full wingspan. The tips fold up again on landing as soon as the 777X\u2019s ground speed slows below 50 knots.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Raked wingtips (also on the 787) have a higher degree of sweep than the rest of the wing. They\u2019re said to interrupt wingtip vortices and decrease drag much like winglets. Boeing and NASA assert that raked wingtips have been shown to reduce drag by as much as 5.5 percent, as opposed to improvements of 3.5 to 4.5 percent from conventional winglets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Joe Clark disagrees. \u201cMy office is right off the main runway at Boeing Field and I watched 777X land, watched those wingtips fold-up and I thought, what an insane idea!,” Clark told Popular Mechanics. “If you put winglets on the 777, you\u2019d have the same or better performance for the wingspan and you wouldn\u2019t have to worry about the gate space. Now they have to fold [the tips]. It\u2019s nuts.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Popular Mechanics reached out to Boeing, but the company said its engineers were unavailable, but NASA Langley\u2019s Rich Wahls, Strategic Technical Advisor for its Advanced Air Vehicles Program, says “there are design trade-offs for both. You can make a winglet or a raked tip work. It really depends on the [specific] wing and airplane.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Since the blended winglet, API has developed a split-scimitar winglet, now seen on over 700 737NGs, notably Southwest and United Airlines. The company has also been working on spiroid winglets, which look like a loop of rigid ribbon at each wing tip, and a new \u201csuper winglet\u201d is also in the works.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Today almost all airliner manufacturers build winglets. Airbus’ winglet design, called the \u201cSharklet,\u201d can be found on the A330neo. These winglets attach to the wing with a smooth curve rather than a sharp angle, lowering interference drag where the wing and winglet pair together. In fact, the drag-reducing design is so similar to API\/Boeing’s blended winglets that it spawned a years-long patent dispute. Eventually, Airbus paid an undisclosed sum to the American-based companies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Nearly 120 years after Frederick W. Lanchester’s original patent, winglets are evidence that early aviation pioneers knew more about aerodynamics than we give them credit. This century-old concept has finally become a permanent part of modern aviation engineering\u2014and it’ll likely fly well into a second century.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Excerpted from <\/em>https:\/\/www.popularmechanics.com\/flight\/airlines\/a32972180\/winglet-history\/<\/em><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"