Number of words – 240<\/p>\n\n\n\n
An accident with an Airbus airplane illustrates the problem. The flight control equipment (often referred to as the automatic pilot) had two modes, one for controlling vertical speed, the other for controlling the flight path\u2019s angle of descent. In one case, when the pilots were attempting to land, the pilots thought that they were controlling the angle of descent, whereas they had accidentally selected the mode that controlled speed of descent. The number (\u20133.3) that was entered into the system to represent an appropriate angle (\u20133.3\u00ba) was too steep a rate of descent when interpreted as vertical speed (\u20133,300 feet\/minute: \u20133.3\u00ba would only be \u2013800 feet\/ minute). This mode confusion contributed to the resulting fatal accident. After a detailed study of the accident, Airbus changed the display on the instrument so that vertical speed would always be displayed with a four-digit number and angle with two digits, thus reducing the chance of confusion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Mode error is really design error. Mode errors are especially likely where the equipment does not make the mode visible, so the user is expected to remember what mode has been established, sometimes hours earlier, during which time many intervening events might have occurred. Designers must try to avoid modes, but if they are necessary, the equipment must make it obvious which mode is invoked. Once again, designers must always compensate for interfering activities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n